Forensic & Expert-Witness
Defensible technical opinions for insurers, law firms, and courts. Methodology grounded in published research; conclusions earned through evidence.
- Methodology before conclusion — every report opens with the analytical framework
- Published-research backing on every methodology citation (DOIs in every report)
- Bilingual reports (English / Arabic) on request, RTL-correct typesetting
- Sworn-deposition-ready: limitations and assumptions stated explicitly
- Inverted-U reinforcement re-analysis methodology (CSCM 2020) — applied to flat-slab failure
- Monostrand anchorage re-validation (Heliyon 2024) — applied to post-tension serviceability
- GIN-method dam grouting envelopes (WPT 2022) — applied to seepage failure analysis
- An insurance carrier needs an independent technical opinion before settlement.
- A law firm requires a sworn expert with publication-grounded methodology.
- A court requires a bilingual report with both English and Arabic registers.
Lebanese Republic · Gulf Cooperation Council on retainer
Standard retainer model with capped re-analysis hours; specific commercial terms quoted per matter.
When a structural opinion has to survive cross-examination, the order of operations matters: methodology before conclusion, sources before assertion, limitations stated rather than buried.
Independent forensic structural opinions for insurers, law firms, and owners — written reports, drawings, anonymised case material, cost-of-remediation estimates. Available for deposition in English or Arabic.
If the file on your desk needs a defensible second opinion, the conversation can start under NDA.